Contents

PDF

Prof. Sachindeo Vaidya (CHEP, IISc) | PDF

Previous: Lecture 20

Recap -- the singular Legendre transform ---

We were discussing canonical quantisation of gauge theories. We saw that \(\mathcal{L}\to H\) is
singular because \(\dot{A}_0 = \Pi_0 = 0\).

Full phase space: \(\left(\Pi_0,\Pi_i,A_0,A_i\right)\). We have \(\Pi_0 = 0\) and \(\dot{A}_0 = 0\),
so dynamics only happens in \(\left(A_i,\Pi_i\right)\) --- again we have an even dimensional phase
space.

We must have

\[ \dot{\Pi}_0 \;=\; \left\{\Pi_0,H\right\} \;=\; 0 \qquad\left(\Pi_0 = 0 \text{ at all times}\right) \]

But \(\left\{\Pi_0,H\right\} = \partial_i\Pi_i\), so

\[ \partial_i\Pi_i \;=\; 0 \qquad(\text{to have dynamics}). \]

i.e. not all \(\Pi_i\) are allowed, but only those \(\Pi_i\) which satisfy \(\partial_i\Pi_i = 0\).

For phase space functions we demand that only those functions which obey

\[ \left\{f,\ \partial_i\Pi^{i}\right\} \;=\; 0 \]

In \(\left\{A_i,\Pi^{j}\right\}\) space not all functions have well defined time evolution; only
those with \(\left\{f,\partial_i\Pi^{i}\right\} = 0\) are allowed. More generally we have the
condition

\[ G\left(A_i,\Pi^{i}\right) \;=\; 0 \qquad\longrightarrow\qquad \text{Gauss' law condition (or constraint).} \]

Gauge fixing as a change of variables ---

Say we change variable from \(G\) to \(Z\) (another variable) that is conjugate to
\(\partial_i\Pi^{i}\). We want the transformation to be non-singular (i.e. invertible).

The Jacobian ---

\[ \text{Jacobian} \;=\; \det\left|\frac{\delta G}{\delta Z}\right| \;=\; \det\left|\left\{G,\ \partial_i\Pi^{i}\right\}_{PB}\right| \;\neq\; 0 \]

(for an infinite dimensional basis). For finite dimensional bases \(A\to B\) with \(B = RA\), a
non-singular transformation means \(|R|\neq 0\).

\[ \frac{\delta}{\delta Z(y)} \;=\; \int d^3x\ \frac{\delta\left(\partial_i\Pi^{i}\right)(y)}{\delta\Pi^{j}(x)}\,\frac{\delta}{\delta A^{j}(x)} \;=\; \left\{\ \cdot\ ,\ \partial_i\Pi^{i}\right\}_{PB} \]

Say we find a non-singular transformation \(G\to Z\). Then

\[ \left\{A_i,\Pi_i\right\} \;\xrightarrow{\ \ G\ \to\ Z\ \ }\; \left\{\tilde{A}_i,\tilde{\Pi}_i\right\} \qquad(\text{change of basis}) \]

such that \(G\left(A_i,\Pi_i\right) = \tilde{A}_3\). Then

\[ \det\left|\left\{G,\partial_i\Pi^{i}\right\}_{PB}\right| \;=\; \det\left\{\frac{\delta G}{\delta\tilde{A}_j}\frac{\delta\left(\partial_i\Pi^{i}\right)}{\delta\tilde{\Pi}_j} - \frac{\delta G}{\delta\tilde{\Pi}_j}\frac{\delta\left(\partial_i\Pi^{i}\right)}{\delta\tilde{A}_j}\right\} \;=\; \det\left|\frac{\delta\left(\partial_i\Pi^{i}\right)}{\delta\tilde{\Pi}_3}\right| \]

i.e. the Jacobian for \(\partial_i\Pi^{i}\longrightarrow\tilde{\Pi}_3\).

1. Coulomb gauge ---

Take \(G = \partial_i A^{i}\). Then

\[ \det\left|\left\{\partial_i A^{i},\ \partial_j\Pi^{j}\right\}_{PB}\right| \;=\; \det\left|\partial_{i_x}\partial_{j_y}\,\delta(\vec{x}-\vec{y})\,\delta_{ij}\right| \]

Zero modes of the Laplacian ---

Look at the Laplacian in 3-space:

\[ \partial_i\partial^{i}F \;=\; \lambda F \]

For zero eigen modes, \(\partial^2 F = 0\):

\[ \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial z^2} \;=\; 0 \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad F = \text{const.} \]

which is non-normalizable. So \(F = 0\) (normalizable zero eigen modes).

Split

\[ \tilde{\Pi}_i \;=\; \tilde{\Pi}^{L}_{i} + \tilde{\Pi}^{T}_{i} \ ,\qquad \tilde{A}_i \;=\; \tilde{A}^{L}_{i} + \tilde{A}^{T}_{i} \]

into longitudinal (\(L\)) and transverse (\(T\)) parts, with the constraint

\[ \partial_i\tilde{\Pi}^{i} \;=\; 0 \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad \partial_i\tilde{\Pi}^{L}_{i} \;=\; 0 \]

The transverse Hamiltonian ---

Let us go back and look at \(H\):

\[ H \;=\; \int d^3x\ \left(\frac{1}{4}F_{ij}F^{ij} + \frac{1}{2}\Pi^{T}_{i}\Pi^{T}_{i}\right) \]

with \(\frac{1}{4}F_{ij}F^{ij}\to\frac{1}{2}B_iB_i\), so

\[ H \;=\; \frac{1}{2}\int d^3x\ \left(\Pi^{T}_{i}\Pi^{T}_{i} + B_iB_i\right) \;=\; H_{\text{EM radiation}} \]

2. Axial (Arnowitt--Fickler) gauge ---

In QED, here the gauge condition is \(A_3 = 0\). Then

\[ \det\left|\frac{\partial}{\partial x_3}\,\delta(\vec{x}-\vec{y})\right| \;\neq\; 0 \]

since \(\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x_3}\) is invertible (an inverse exists). So the determinant
exists, and we can solve for \(\Pi_3\).

We have

\[ \partial_i\Pi^{i} = 0 \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad \partial_3\Pi^{3} \;=\; -\left(\partial_1\Pi^{1} + \partial_2\Pi^{2}\right) \] \[ \Pi^{3}(\vec{x},t) \;=\; -\int_{-\infty}^{z}\left(\partial_1\Pi^{1} + \partial_2\Pi^{2}\right)dx_3 \]

So \(\Pi^{3} = \Pi^{3}\left[\Pi_1,\Pi_2\right]\), a functional of \(\Pi_1\) and \(\Pi_2\).

The canonical variables are \(A_1, A_2, \Pi^{1}, \Pi^{2}\), and

\[ H \;=\; \frac{1}{2}\int d^3x\ \left(\Pi_i\Pi_i + B_iB_i\right) \] \[ H \;=\; \frac{1}{2}\int d^3x\ \left(\Pi_1^2 + \Pi_2^2 + \Pi_3^2\left[\Pi_1,\Pi_2\right] + B_1^2 + B_2^2 + B_3^2\right) \]

\(\Pi_3\) is not a local function, so \(H\) is \underline{non-local}. That is the problem with the
axial gauge. (The Hamiltonian is indeed simple to write down, but the price is that the
Hamiltonian in the axial gauge is non-local.)

The magnetic field in axial gauge ---

\[ B_i \;=\; \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}F_{jk} \] \[ B_1 \;=\; \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{1jk}\left(\partial_j A_k - \partial_k A_j\right) \;=\; \frac{1}{2}\left(\epsilon_{123}\left(\partial_2 A_3 - \partial_3 A_2\right) + \epsilon_{132}\left(\partial_3 A_2 - \partial_2 A_3\right)\right) \;=\; -\partial_3 A_2 \] \[ B_2 \;=\; -\partial_1\underbrace{A_3}_{0} + \partial_3 A_1 \;=\; \partial_3 A_1 \ ,\qquad B_3 \;=\; \partial_1 A_2 - \partial_2 A_1 \]

Path integral -- phase space formulation ---

With \(A^{T}\equiv A_{\perp}\),

\[ \text{PI} \;=\; \int\mathcal{D}\tilde{A}_{\perp}\int\mathcal{D}\tilde{\Pi}_{\perp}\ \exp\left(i\int\left(\tilde{\Pi}_{\perp}\cdot\dot{\tilde{A}}_{\perp} - \mathcal{H}\right)d^4x\right) \]

Compare with the non-relativistic path integral

\[ \text{PI} \;=\; \int\mathcal{D}q\,\mathcal{D}p\ \exp\left(\int\left(p\dot{q} - H\right)dt\right) \]

So

\[ \text{PI} \;=\; \int\mathcal{D}\tilde{A}_{\perp}\,\mathcal{D}\tilde{\Pi}_{\perp} \underbrace{\int\mathcal{D}\tilde{A}_3\,\delta\!\left(\tilde{A}_3\right)\mathcal{D}\tilde{\Pi}_3\, \delta\!\left(\tilde{\Pi}_3 - \tilde{\Pi}_3(\Pi_{\perp})\right)}_{1}\ \exp\left(i\int\left(\tilde{\Pi}_i\dot{\tilde{A}}_i - \mathcal{H}\right)d^4x\right) \]

with

\[ \delta\!\left(\tilde{\Pi}_3 - \tilde{\Pi}_3(\Pi_{\perp})\right) \;=\; \delta\!\left(\partial_i\tilde{\Pi}^{i}\right) \det\left|\left\{\partial_i\tilde{\Pi}^{i},\ \tilde{A}_3\right\}_{PB}\right| \]

Write

\[ \delta\!\left(\partial_i\tilde{\Pi}^{i}\right) \;=\; \int\mathcal{D}A_0\ e^{\,i\int A_0\partial_i\tilde{\Pi}^{i}} \]

using \(\delta(x) = \int da\ e^{iax}\). (Note that here \(A_0\neq\phi\): it is a variable introduced
to exponentiate the delta function, and it is not yet physical.) Therefore

\[ \text{PI} \;=\; \int\mathcal{D}\tilde{A}_{\perp}\,\mathcal{D}\tilde{A}_3\,\mathcal{D}\tilde{\Pi}_{\perp}\, \mathcal{D}A_0\,\mathcal{D}\tilde{\Pi}_3\ \det\left|\left\{\partial_i\Pi_i,\ \tilde{A}_3\right\}\right| \exp\left[i\int d^4x\left\{\tilde{\Pi}_{\perp}\cdot\dot{\tilde{A}}_{\perp} + \tilde{\Pi}_3\dot{\tilde{A}}_3 - \mathcal{H} + A_0\partial_i\tilde{\Pi}^{i}\right\}\right] \]

Here

\[ \mathcal{H} \;=\; \frac{1}{2}\left(\tilde{\Pi}_{\perp}\cdot\tilde{\Pi}_{\perp} + \tilde{\Pi}_3\tilde{\Pi}_3 + \tilde{B}_i\tilde{B}_i\right) \]

and in compact notation

\[ \text{PI} \;=\; \int\mathcal{D}A_\mu\,\mathcal{D}\Pi_i\ \delta(\mathcal{G}) \det\left|\left\{\partial_i\Pi^{i},\ \mathcal{G}\right\}_{PB}\right|\ e^{\,i\int d^4x\left(\Pi_i\dot{A}_i - \mathcal{H} + A_0\partial_i\Pi^{i}\right)} \]

Now do the integral over the \(\Pi_i\)'s.

Homework ---

  1. Ch. 7 --- all problems.
  2. Ch. 8.1 --- A, B, C; and Ch. 8.2 --- A, B.
Translate this page