\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[thick] (0,2.4) -- (0,0) -- (2.3,0);
\node[above right] at (0,2.4) {$S$};
\draw[thick] (2.3,2.4) -- (2.3,0) -- (8.4,0);
\node[above right] at (2.3,2.4) {$S'$};
\draw[->] (2.3,1.65) -- (2.95,1.65) node[right] {$u$};
\end{tikzpicture}
Event \((E_1)\): Fire cracker explode at \(x\) in frame \(S\) at time \(t\)
Event \((E_2)\): origins coincide at \(x=0\) at \(t=0\)
In \(S'\) frame \(E_1\) occurs at \((x',t')\)
\(E_2\) occurs at \((x'=0,\ t'=0)\)
So coordinate of event \(E_1\) in frame \(S' = (x',t')\) where
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1.15]
\draw[->] (-2.2,0) -- (2.7,0) node[right] {$x$};
\draw[->] (0,-1.8) -- (0,2.4) node[above] {$y$};
\draw[dashed,->] (-1.95,-1.37) -- (2.55,1.79) node[right] {$x'$};
\draw[dashed,->] (1.05,-1.50) -- (-1.45,2.07) node[above left] {$y'$};
\fill (1.20,1.70) circle (1.5pt);
\node[above right] at (1.15,1.72) {$(x,y)$};
\draw[dashed] (1.20,1.70) -- (1.20,0);
\draw[dashed] (1.20,1.70) -- (0,1.70);
\draw (0.55,0) arc (0:35:0.55);
\node at (0.78,0.20) {\scriptsize $\theta$};
\draw[<->] (0,-0.38) -- (1.20,-0.38);
\node[below] at (0.60,-0.36) {\scriptsize $x$};
\end{tikzpicture}
\[
\begin{aligned}
x' &= x\cos\theta + y\sin\theta\\
y' &= -x\sin\theta + y\cos\theta
\end{aligned}
\]
Came from the way unit vectors transform
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[->] (0,0) -- (3.0,0);
\node[below] at (1.05,-0.02) {$\hat{e}_x$};
\draw[->] (0,0) -- (0,2.1);
\node[left] at (-0.05,1.25) {$\hat{e}_y$};
\draw[->] (0,0) -- (1.95,1.95);
\node[right] at (1.00,0.80) {$\hat{e}_x{}'$};
\draw[->] (0,0) -- (-1.40,1.40);
\node[left] at (-0.80,0.72) {$\hat{e}_y{}'$};
\draw (0.78,0) arc (0:45:0.78);
\node at (1.00,0.30) {\scriptsize $\theta$};
\draw (0,0.98) arc (90:135:0.98);
\node at (-0.22,1.10) {\scriptsize $\theta$};
\end{tikzpicture}
\[
\begin{aligned}
\hat{e}_x{}' &= \hat{e}_x\cos\theta + \hat{e}_y\sin\theta\\
\hat{e}_y{}' &= -\hat{e}_x\sin\theta + \hat{e}_y\cos\theta
\end{aligned}
\]
The Lorentz transformation
\(E_1\): Bullet is fired at location \(x_1\) at time \(t_1\)
\(E_2\): bullet hits wall at location \(x_2\) at time \(t_2\)
If we observe same pair of events from a frame \(S'\) moving with speed `\(u\)' relative to \(S\).
Then from lorentz transformations :
lets find
\(\Rightarrow\) Difference of coordinates & times also follows lorentz transformation
from our results
So speed of bullet according to \(S' \neq V-u\) but
For Galilean result \(c\to\infty\)
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[thick] (0,2.3) -- (0,0) -- (7.4,0);
\node[above right] at (0,2.3) {$S$};
\draw (1.7,2.3) -- (1.7,0.85) -- (6.9,0.85);
\node[above right] at (1.7,2.3) {$S'$};
\draw[->] (1.7,1.05) -- (2.3,1.05) node[right] {$u$};
\draw (3.9,1.12) circle (0.14);
\draw[->] (4.1,1.05) -- (4.75,1.05) node[right] {$W$};
\draw[->] (3.9,0.80) -- (3.9,0.98);
\end{tikzpicture}
What will be speed of bullet w.r.t. frame \(S\).
So \(V \neq u+w\) but somewhat less than that
If \(\Delta t = 0\) (simultaneous in `\(S\)' frame)
This implies that
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[thick] (0,1.95) -- (0,0.55) -- (10.4,0.55);
\node[above right] at (0,1.95) {$S$};
\draw (1.35,1.95) -- (1.35,1.18) -- (8.5,1.18);
\node[above right] at (1.35,1.95) {$S'$};
\draw[->] (1.35,1.52) -- (1.95,1.52) node[right] {$u$};
\draw (8.5,1.18) -- (8.5,2.00) -- (9.85,1.80) -- (9.85,1.10) -- cycle;
\node at (9.18,1.55) {\scriptsize engine};
\draw (2.85,1.05) circle (0.15);
\node[left] at (2.66,1.01) {\scriptsize clock};
\draw (6.95,1.05) circle (0.15);
\node[left] at (6.76,1.01) {\scriptsize clock};
\node at (3.85,1.62) {\scriptsize $(x_1',t_1')$};
\node at (7.75,1.62) {\scriptsize $(x_2',t_2')$};
\fill (3.25,0.55) circle (1.3pt);
\node[below,align=center] at (3.25,0.48) {$x_1$\\$t$};
\fill (7.25,0.55) circle (1.3pt);
\node[below,align=center] at (7.25,0.48) {$x_2$\\$t$};
\end{tikzpicture}
\[
\Rightarrow \quad \Delta t' \;=\; -\,\frac{u\,\Delta x}{c^{2}}\,\gamma
\]
\[
t_2' - t_1' \;=\; -\,\frac{u\,(x_2' - x_1')\,\gamma}{c^{2}}
\]
\[
\boxed{\; t_2' \;=\; t_1' \;-\; \frac{u\,\Delta x}{c^{2}}\,\gamma \;}
\]
Clocks at frond end are behind the clocks of rear end by amount
Or we can check,
Or consider an example :-
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[thick] (0,2.4) -- (0,0) -- (10.2,0);
\draw (1.7,2.45) -- (1.7,1.45) -- (7.5,1.45) -- (7.5,1.05);
\node[above right] at (1.7,2.45) {$S'$};
\draw (1.50,1.28) -- (1.90,1.62);
\draw (1.50,1.62) -- (1.90,1.28);
\draw (1.70,1.22) -- (1.70,1.68);
\draw (7.30,1.28) -- (7.70,1.62);
\draw (7.30,1.62) -- (7.70,1.28);
\draw (7.50,1.22) -- (7.50,1.68);
\draw[->] (7.65,1.20) -- (8.35,1.20) node[right] {$u$};
\node at (3.55,1.15) {$c$};
\draw[<-] (3.80,1.15) -- (4.45,1.15);
\fill (4.60,1.15) circle (1.5pt);
\draw[->] (4.75,1.15) -- (5.40,1.15);
\node at (5.65,1.15) {$c$};
\end{tikzpicture}
w.r.t frame \(S'\) explosions are simultaneous
but w.r.t frame `\(S\)' explosions are not simultaneous.
explosion at rear end happened earlier & explosion at frond end happens later.
(the \(u^2/c^2\) under the root goes to \(0\) as \(c\to\infty\))
(Q.1) I have a clock
According to me
According to you who is in frame \(S'\) :-
This is exactly what we expect, as according to \(S'\) `\(S\)' frame is moving so, \((\tau < \Delta t')\)
moving clocks runs slower.
If you are carrying clock and moving.
\((\Delta t > \Delta t')\) as expected. (first is \(I\), second is you)
I see your clock is moving, so \((\Delta t' < \Delta t)\).
It is similar to case, we both (I & you) carry a light clock.
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[thick] (0,3.5) -- (0,0) -- (9.2,0);
\draw (1.75,3.5) -- (1.75,1.80) -- (6.8,1.80);
\draw[->] (1.75,2.55) -- (2.40,2.55);
\node[right] at (2.42,2.55) {$u$};
\node at (2.45,2.05) {(You)};
\draw[->] (3.35,3.05) -- (4.70,1.88);
\draw[->] (4.70,1.88) -- (6.05,3.05);
\draw (3.05,3.02) -- (3.70,3.16);
\draw (5.75,3.02) -- (6.40,3.16);
\draw (4.35,1.80) -- (5.05,1.80);
\node at (0.95,0.80) {(I)};
\draw[->] (2.55,0.10) -- (2.55,1.30);
\draw (2.20,1.28) -- (2.90,1.42);
\end{tikzpicture}
We accuse each other of using slower clocks.
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[thick] (0,1.9) -- (0,0) -- (7.8,0);
\node[above left] at (0.1,1.9) {$S$};
\draw[->] (0,1.5) -- (0,1.9);
\draw (0.35,0.98) rectangle (3.45,1.36);
\node[above] at (1.90,1.38) {$L_0$};
\node at (1.90,1.16) {\scriptsize $S'$ frame};
\draw[->] (3.50,1.17) -- (4.25,1.17) node[right] {$u$};
\end{tikzpicture}
To measure length of rod in ground frame \((S)\) we need to mark ends of rod simultaneously \((\Delta t = 0)\).
\(\left( \underline{\text{How}}\ ? \right)\) Actually the measurment of our rod in moving frame was not simultaneous
So You will claim that I measured front end first then rod passes some distance and then rear end marking were taken.
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw (0.6,0.95) rectangle (3.4,1.38);
\node[above] at (2.0,1.40) {$1\,\mathrm{m}$};
\draw[->] (3.45,1.16) -- (4.20,1.16) node[right] {$u$};
\draw (5.3,0.95) -- (7.3,0.95);
\draw (8.3,0.95) -- (10.6,0.95);
\foreach \x in {5.4,5.65,...,7.2} { \draw (\x,0.95) -- (\x-0.18,0.72); }
\foreach \x in {8.4,8.65,...,10.5} { \draw (\x,0.95) -- (\x-0.18,0.72); }
\draw[<->] (7.3,0.55) -- (8.3,0.55);
\node[below] at (7.8,0.52) {$0.5\,\mathrm{m}$};
\node[below] at (7.8,0.12) {hole};
\end{tikzpicture}
(Q) A moving rod contracts to half of its length. will it fall ?
According to rod frame hole is just \(0.25\) m long so it might not fall.
But It will fall according to ground frame
what happens is --- Frond end enters in first, rear end comes later on. & rod falls in the hole.